Saturday, April 14, 2018

Kawananakoas/Campbells, Kuhio's et. als. Stripped of their Royal Status by Queen Liliuokalani, et. als.




Royal Tidings Vol. 2018-0411 Royal Families News on the Web - Re the Kawananakoas/Campbells, Kuhio's et. als.

Amelia Gora <hawaiianhistory@gmail.com>Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 7:43 AM

To: Ruthie Caudill <ruthiejim13@gmail.com>

Hi Ruthie,

The two Princes Kuhio and Kawananakoa were treasonous and stripped of their Royal status by Queen Liliuokalani/

Tane Inciong a longtime researcher said the following:

"Liliuokalani disinherited both Kawananakoa and Kuhio and as stated in the constitution they were pulled out of the line of succession as if dead. Kaiulani and whomever had to be approved by the monarch (Queen), if not than she would be pulled out of the line of succession as prescribed by the constitution.  Successor would have to be drawn from survivors of the Royal school and their descendants, which left Jane Loeau and Abigail Maheha...."

Note:  Princess Poomaikelani and her heirss/descendants were next in line after Kaiulani died.  Poomaikelani died in 1895 and had children and stepchildren which includes our family.

This is a Monarchy turned Constitutional Monarchy with Premeditation documented.

Kawananakoa is Not the heir.


There are Kamehameha descendants/bloodline heirs.

The whole point is that the Princes Kawananakoa and Kuhio did Not have Kamehameha bloodlines..........



Because of this, the Queen regnant, Liliuokalani disinherited them. Thus they were pulled out of any line of succession as if dead. That is the power of the monarch under the Hawaiian Kingdom Constitution, laws and policy declared and accepted by the realm.

Like the lies about having Annexation and there was none as discovered by Williamson Chang (law professor and head of the law school) Hawaii could not be annexed by the U.S. or any other country for that matter..

All illegal business.

The Kawananakoa's are riding on Our families and are Not the descendants of our ancestor Poomaikelani.

We will have our Hawaiian Kingdom Court against these pirates................did you know what's at stake is the Crown Lands, the gold, etc.

Racketeering documented ......history reveals all, plus I have copies of the 501c(3) and she operates as a Corporation, not a real person.

The Corporation is Not related to our families who have the blood and real living persons with Sovereigns bloodlines.

aloha.




references:



  1. Aug 14, 2017 · Abigail Kawananakoa Exposed by Hawaii Free Press Sunday, ... Princess Abigail K Kawananakoa." ... Amelia Gora. 1 min · http ...
  2. Jun 12, 2013 · Opposition to the CLOWN /Not Crown Abigail Kawananakoa Request to be Buried at ... Abigail Kawananakoa should NOT be buried at the ... Amelia Gora, House ...
  3. ... Amelia Gora did find the article showing that U.S ... David Kawananakoa had married Abigail ... non-Hawaiian/kanaka maoli remain for the Kawananakoa ...
  4. Compiled by Amelia Gora (2012) ... Kuhio, and Kawananakoa. ... opednews.com Researcher (history, genealogy(ies), and legal), ...
  5. Oct 02, 2017 · Abigail Kawananakoa married her partner, ... Amelia Gray is joined by mother Lisa Rinna on beach in Mexico after the teen revealed she used to be anorexic ...
  6. Dec 29, 2015 · WHO Are the Heirs/Successors of King David Kalakaua Who Died in 1891? Including the Kamehameha's Royal Families? by ... Amelia Gora, ...
  7. Oct 28, 2010 · IOLANI Legal Notice 10/29/2010. ... As one of the descendants/heirs of Queen Liliuokalani thru her daughters Abigail/Kapapoko ... Amelia Gora. article:
  8. Feb 05, 2015 · Hawaiian Kingdom Facts: 1) Sovereign - Permanent ... Hawaiian Kingdom Facts: 1) Sovereign - Permanent Branch; 2) ... Amelia Gora am one of his descendants ...
  9. Jan 31, 2015 · The Royal Families in the Hawaiian Islands by Amelia Gora ... Abigail Maheha (w); ... Englishmen Owns Nothing In the Hawaiian Islands by Amelia Gora ...
  10. A Hawaiian heiress, 91, is fighting her former lawyer over control of her $215 million fortune. Abigail Kawananakoa's lawyer is a trustee of her estate and is looking to keep control.
  11. Sep 16, 2014 · Tribunal Case(s): Genocide Activities Ongoing File at the Honolulu ... Genocide Activities File/List' for Abigail Kawananakoa, ... Amelia Gora - one of the ...
  12. Apr 01, 2018 · Santa Claus and Hawaii. SANTA CLAUS from Hawaii. By Amelia Kuulei Gora, ... Prince Kuhio’s brother David Kawananakoa had married Abigail Campbell, ...

On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 3:42 AM, Ruthie Caudill <ruthiejim13@gmail.com> wrote:
Aloha Amelia,

What is so difficult to understand?

I guess people want to believe what they want, so they can take what is not theirs.






​Someone in America is making a claim that he is legal heir to the throne and his family was hidden during the coup.  


I do not know if it is true, but that is the statement.


Dawn Wasson seems to be hanging in there.






​Kamuela Gomes was arrested yesterday (signed by Soong, of course) for "Terroristic Threatening in the First Degree":


2013 Hawaii Revised Statutes
TITLE 37. HAWAII PENAL CODE
707. Offenses Against the Person
707-716 Terroristic threatening in the first degree.
Universal Citation: HI Rev Stat § 707-716 (2013)
§707-716 Terroristic threatening in the first degree. (1) A person commits the offense of terroristic threatening in the first degree if the person commits terroristic threatening:
(a) By threatening another person on more than one occasion for the same or a similar purpose;
(b) By threats made in a common scheme against different persons;
(c) Against a public servant arising out of the performance of the public servant's official duties. For the purposes of this paragraph, "public servant" includes but is not limited to an educational worker. "Educational worker" has the same meaning as defined in section 707-711;
(d) Against any emergency medical services provider who is engaged in the performance of duty. For purposes of this paragraph, "emergency medical services provider" means emergency medical services personnel, as defined in section 321-222, and physicians, physician's assistants, nurses, nurse practitioners, certified registered nurse anesthetists, respiratory therapists, laboratory technicians, radiology technicians, and social workers, providing services in the emergency room of a hospital;
(e) With the use of a dangerous instrument or a simulated firearm. For purposes of this section, "simulated firearm" means any object that:
(i) Substantially resembles a firearm;
(ii) Can reasonably be perceived to be a firearm; or
(iii) Is used or brandished as a firearm; or
(f) By threatening a person who:
(i) The defendant has been restrained from, by order of any court, including an ex parte order, contacting, threatening, or physically abusing pursuant to chapter 586; or
(ii) Is being protected by a police officer ordering the defendant to leave the premises of that protected person pursuant to section 709-906(4), during the effective period of that order.
(2) Terroristic threatening in the first degree is a class C felony. [L 1979, c 184, pt of §1(2); am L 1989, c 131, §1; gen ch 1992; am L 2006, c 230, §31; am L 2007, c 79, §2; am L 2010, c 146, §2; am L 2011, c 63, §4; am L 2013, c 255, §1]
Case Notes
A U.S. military police officer is not a "public servant" for purposes of this section. 552 F. Supp. 2d 1108 (2008).
For purposes of establishing subject matter jurisdiction, defendant who placed threatening telephone call from California to Hawaii engaged in conduct occurring within Hawaii. 72 H. 591, 825 P.2d 1062.
Court erred in concluding section requires threat to be communicated directly or indirectly to person and that communication of threat to third party was insufficient. 75 H. 398, 862 P.2d 1063 (1993).
Section not unconstitutional where threats sufficiently unequivocal, unconditional, immediate, and specific as to convey a gravity of purpose and imminent prospect of execution. 75 H. 398, 862 P.2d 1063 (1993).
Double jeopardy clause of Hawaii constitution did not bar terroristic threatening prosecution of defendant who had been found guilty of abuse under §709-906. 75 H. 446, 865 P.2d 150 (1994).
Terroristic threatening not a lesser included offense of intimidating a witness within the meaning of §701-109(4)(a); multiple conviction of terroristic threatening and intimidating a witness not barred by §701-109(4)(c). 75 H. 517, 865 P.2d 157 (1994).
Where no evidence was presented that any "dangerous instrument" other than a firearm was involved, which established an element of the underlying felony under this section, §134-6(a) did not apply. 83 H. 229, 925 P.2d 797 (1996).
Defendant's first degree terroristic threatening conviction remanded for new trial where instructions did not sufficiently inform jury that, to constitute a "true threat", defendant's threatening utterance was objectively susceptible to inducing fear of bodily injury in a reasonable person at whom the threat was directed and who was familiar with the circumstances under which the threat was uttered. 95 H. 465, 24 P.3d 661 (2001).
Defendant's first degree terroristic threatening conviction remanded for new trial where trial court failed to instruct jury that it could consider relevant attributes of both the defendant and the subject of the allegedly threatening utterance in determining whether the subject's fear of bodily injury, as allegedly induced by defendant's threatening utterance, was objectively reasonable under the circumstances in which the threat was uttered. 95 H. 465, 24 P.3d 661 (2001).
Neither the free speech clause of the U.S. Constitution nor that of the Hawaii constitution impose a temporal "immediacy" requirement that must be met before words become subject to criminal prosecution as "true threats". 95 H. 465, 24 P.3d 661 (2001).
The offense of terroristic threatening in the first degree does not require a nexus between the alleged threat and the threatened person's status as a public servant where the threatened person is a government officer or employee; thus, trial court did not err in failing to give a nexus instruction. 111 H. 327, 141 P.3d 974 (2006).
Trial court's failure to instruct the jury that it could consider the relevant attributes of both the defendant and the subject of the allegedly threatening utterance in determining whether the subject's fear of bodily injury, as allegedly induced by the defendant's threatening utterance, was objectively reasonable under the circumstances in which the threat was uttered, was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt because there was a reasonable possibility that the error contributed to defendant's conviction. 111 H. 327, 141 P.3d 974 (2006).
Where jury was not given a specific unanimity instruction with respect to the first degree terroristic threatening offense under this section, was never informed which act committed by defendant coincided with the two terroristic threatening counts, and convicted defendant of one count and acquitted defendant of the other, there was a genuine possibility that different jurors concluded that defendant committed different acts; thus, to correct any potential confusion in the case, a specific unanimity jury instruction should have been given to insure that the jury understood its duty to unanimously agree to a particular set of facts. 121 H. 339, 219 P.3d 1126 (2009).
Terroristic threatening in second degree can be an offense included in terroristic threatening in first degree; trial court's failure to instruct jury on the lesser included offense was not plain error, where defendant contended there was a rational basis in the record for jury to decide that, although defendant made a terroristic threat, defendant did not do so with a dangerous instrument as defined in §707-700. 10 H. App. 584, 880 P.2d 213 (1994).
Terroristic threatening charge under subsection (1)(d) remanded for prosecutorial misconduct and where evidence of defendant's violation of furlough was not a fact of consequence to any material issue under this section. 82 H. 517 (App.), 923 P.2d 934 (1996).
One may be charged with a violation of subsection (1)(d) when a dangerous instrument is employed in connection with a threat to property as proscribed by §707-715. 88 H. 477 (App.), 967 P.2d 674 (1998).
Subsection (1)(c) was not unconstitutionally vague when applied to defendant's conduct of threatening to kill public servants because of their performance of official duties; this section gave defendant fair notice that defendant's conduct was prohibited and afforded defendant the opportunity to choose between lawful and unlawful conduct. 105 H. 261 (App.), 96 P.3d 590 (2004).
Where there were no jury instructions requiring unanimity as to the person or persons threatened, thus allowing each juror seven choices as to the persons threatened and not requiring all jurors to agree on no less than one person, trial court violated the rule requiring a unanimous jury regarding the person or persons threatened, which was necessary to prove the offense charged. 114 H. 135 (App.), 157 P.3d 574 (2007






We don't have anything that broad in Virginia. I did not like the way this was handled and I bailed Kamuela out of jail.


I wish I could find a Kanaka who would not turn on the Kanaka (like the Kanaka involved in the Quiet Title with Mark Zuckerberg) to help get through Law School and make a legal stand against what is happening.

We will keep working against what happened.

If you can think of any other way I can help here within a stone's throw (make it a big one ;) ) of DC, let me know.

I am busy with my other cases, but what is happening in Hawaii is very important.

"We Are Not Free Until We Are All Free"

Mahalo,

Ruth



On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 10:24 PM Amelia Gora <hawaiianhistory@gmail.com> wrote:

Royal Tidings No. 2028-0411 Royal Families news on the web - Sharing a Preview of What's to Come...

Royal Tidings No. 2018-0411  ROYAL FAMILIES news on the web  
  April 11, 2018


hi Everyone,

Ruthie Caudill is helping............thank you Ruthie....

for everyones information, this is Poomaikelani's obituary:

The Independent. (Honolulu, H.I.) 1895-1905, October 03, 1895, Image 3

Image provided by University of Hawaii at Manoa; Honolulu, HI

Persistent link: http://chroniclingamerica.loc.gov/lccn/sn85047097/1895-10-03/ed-1/seq-3/

Page
Page
Page
note:  this is after the wrongful dethronement of Queen Liliuokalani.
Poomaikelani's sisters were Kapiolani and Kinoiki - the mother of Kuhio and Kawananakoa.

Queen Kapiolani was the hanai daughter of our great grandfather Kaluakini who was married to Haili the daughter of Poomaikelani.
Kaluakini and Haili had our grandmother Elikapeka Kaluakini.

No wonder that little old ladies group wanted me to join their group..........the group was made up of Abigail Kawananakoa; Dr. Johnson -retired from University of Hawaii; and Myrtle Schumann whose nice Owana Salazar picked up after Myrtle died.

Major issues but will clear that up too.............now have to hunt for the mailings from Abigail Kawananakoa.........good evidence!

Thank you again Ruthie!

aloha everyone.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xf-IS08VFfU
6:10

Ooklah The Moc - Hell Fire - Rearrange Your Positive - Duration: 6:10.

  • 10 years ago
  • 612,812 views
Ooklah The Moc, Hell fire from Rearrange your positive album. Roots Reggae Music. Hawaii.

No comments:

Post a Comment